![]() Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, Wellington, New Zealand. National Crisis Management Centre (2016). “The role of boundary organisation after disasters: New Zealand’s Natural Hazards Research Platform and the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence”. Earthquake Spectra, 32(2): 713-735.īeaven S, Wilson T, Johnston L, Johnston D and Smith R (2016). “Research engagement after disasters: research coordination before, during and after the 2011-2012 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New Zealand”. “Natural hazards platform-Interim research strategy”.īeaven S, Wilson T, Johnston J, Johnston D and Smith R (2016). NHRP (Natural Hazards Research Platform) (2009). National Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan Order. “Research, Science and Emergency Management: Partnering for Resilience”. “Integrated Risk Management for Natural and Technological Disasters”. “A Systems Approach to Security Management”. The Guide to the National Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan 2015, ISBN 0-0, Helm P (2009). “Transforming governance: How national policies and organizations for managing disaster recovery evolved following the 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquakes”. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of Disaster Research (pp. “Managing societal uncertainty in volcanic hazards: a multidisciplinary approach”. Ronan KR, Paton D, Johnston DM and Houghton BF (2000). Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 50(2): 85-93. “Strong ground motion observations of engineering interest from the 14 November 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand earthquake”. “The Kaikōura (New Zealand) earthquake: preliminary seismological report”. Kaiser A, Balfour N, Fry B, Holden C, Litchfield N, Gerstenberger M, D’Anastasio E, Horspool N, McVerry G, Ristau J, Bannister S, Christophersen A, Clark K, Power W, Rhoades D, Massey C, Hamling I, Wallace L, Mountjoy J, Kaneko Y, Benites R, Van Houtte C, Dellow S, Wotherspoon L, Elwood K and Gledhill K (2017). “Complex multifault rupture during the 2016, 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand”. ![]() Hamling IJ, Hreinsdóttir S, Clark K, Elliott J, Liang C, Fielding E, Litchfield N, Villamor P, Wallace L, Wright TJ, D’Anastasio E, Bannister S, Burbidge D, Denys P, Gentle P, Howarth J, Mueller C, Palmer N, Pearson C, Power W, Barnes P, Barrell DJA, Van Dissen R, Langridge R, Little T, Nicol A, Pettinga J, Rowland J and Stirling M, (2017). This paper explores that effort and acknowledges the successes and lessons learned by the teams involved. ![]() Coordinating these disciplines and institutions required significant effort to assist New Zealand during its most complex earthquake yet recorded. Many research disciplines, from engineering and geophysics to social science, were heavily involved in the response. With many areas isolated as a result, it presented science teams with logistical challenges as well as the need to coordinate efforts across institutional and disciplinary boundaries. The earthquake was complex, with 21 faults rupturing throughout the North Canterbury and Marlborough landscape, generating a localised seven metre tsunami and triggering thousands of landslides. The M7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake in 2016 presented a number of challenges to science agencies and institutions throughout New Zealand. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |